Last edited by Dalkis
Thursday, May 14, 2020 | History

3 edition of Costs and benefits of interstate banking and branching found in the catalog.

Costs and benefits of interstate banking and branching

hearing before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision, Regulation, and Deposit Insurance of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, first session, June 22, 1993.

by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs. Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision, Regulation, and Deposit Insurance.

  • 203 Want to read
  • 28 Currently reading

Published by U.S. G.P.O., For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office in Washington .
Written in English

    Places:
  • United States.
    • Subjects:
    • Interstate banking -- United States.,
    • Branch banks -- United States.,
    • Bank loans -- United States.

    • Classifications
      LC ClassificationsKF27 .B544 1993i
      The Physical Object
      Paginationiii, 156 p. :
      Number of Pages156
      ID Numbers
      Open LibraryOL1144599M
      ISBN 10016041637X
      LC Control Number94115662

      Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of September Signed into law by President Bill Clinton in September , the law removed several obstacles to banks opening branches in other states and provided a uniform set of rules regarding banking in each state.   S. (rd). An original bill to permit certain financial institutions to engage in interstate banking and branching. In , a database of bills in the U.S. Congress.

        The interstate banking bill is formally known as the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of , after two lawmakers who are . 2 Assessing a Decade of Interstate Bank Branching Christian A. Johnson and Tara Rice “One aspect of the American banking system that quickly impresses itself on the mind of a foreign observer is its fragmented structure [The] prospective developments in the payments mechanism –.

      ASSESSING A DECADE OF INTERSTATE BANK BRANCHING 77 commercial banks in the United States. Based upon our empirical analysis, covering all fifty states plus the District of Columbia over eleven years, we find that certain state-imposed restrictions permitted by IBBEA are associated with limited out-of-state branch growth in some states.   The push toward interstate banking has been dealt a severe setback this week by an appeals court ruling involving the Federal Reserve Board .


Share this book
You might also like
Increasing seat belt use among North Carolina high school students

Increasing seat belt use among North Carolina high school students

Ionic solvation

Ionic solvation

They said what?

They said what?

Welfare of women and children

Welfare of women and children

Book of saints

Book of saints

Seventy years of Irish life

Seventy years of Irish life

Federal politics and government

Federal politics and government

Clinical signs

Clinical signs

Solar corona and solar wind

Solar corona and solar wind

guide to graduate education in speech pathology and audiology 1975-1976

guide to graduate education in speech pathology and audiology 1975-1976

Night call from a distant time zone

Night call from a distant time zone

Roentgenographic technique

Roentgenographic technique

Whole

Whole

El cumpleaños =

El cumpleaños =

Costs and benefits of interstate banking and branching by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs. Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision, Regulation, and Deposit Insurance. Download PDF EPUB FB2

Costs and benefits of interstate banking and branching hearings before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision, Regulation, and Deposit Insurance of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, first session, J Pages: Costs and benefits of interstate banking and branching: hearing before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision, Regulation, and Deposit Insurance of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, first session, J.

GAO found that: (1) the relaxation of restrictive state banking laws has contributed to a substantial increase in interstate banking in the United States; (2) removing federal interstate banking and branching restrictions would further encourage the growth of larger, more geographically diversified banking companies; (3) increased interstate banking has led to substantial consolidation of the U.S.

banking. This paper uses the staggering timing of branching and interstate banking deregulation as a natural experiment to explore the effect of agency cost on the use of bank loan commitments. A simple inventory-based model shows that lower agency cost allows a bank to issue more loan.

rently allow interstate banking only on a reciprocal or regional basis.1 As of June 1,BHCs will also be able to convert their banks in various states into branches of a single interstate bank.2 Some advocates of reform claim that the act will make U.S.

institutions more efficient by allowing them to convert their bank subsidiaries. By contrasting data of consolidated multibank holding companies with that of independent banks with branches, we assess their relative scale economies and cost advantages by asset size.

Our analysis supports the assertion of the U. Department of Treasury that expansion through interstate branching would provide immediate cost savings.

The Case for Interstate Branch Banking David L. Mengle l When asked about the most important develop: ments in banking in the decade of the Os, most people are likely to point to the thrift debacle or to losses on loans to less developed countries. But arguably more influential has been a.

Introduction. Although the historical barriers to interstate banking activities had been significantly relaxed in recent years by state-level interstate banking legislation, the passage of the Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of (IBBEA) represents an important milestone in the movement toward unrestricted nationwide interstate banking and branching activities.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Federal Reserve, the central bank of the United States, provides the nation with a safe, flexible, and stable monetary and financial system. The passage of the Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of will usher in an era of widespread branch banking.

(4) INTERSTATE BRANCHThe term "interstate branch" means a branch established pursuant to this title or any amendment made by this title to any other provision of law and any branch of a bank controlled by an out-of-State bank holding company (as defined in section 2(o)(7) of the Bank Holding Company Act of ).

This study examines recent interstate bank geographic diversification inside the United States. More than 80 holding companies that gradually evolved into interstate banking companies were tested for significant linkages to risk and efficiency indicators. The study finds that while geographic expansion frequently is associated with increases in risk, when banking firms were grouped by.

Holes can also be punched in the argument that large, out-of-state organizations will drain resources from local communities. Banks do not need interstate banking and branching legislation to move deposits out of an area; that possibility already exists through correspondent banking relationships and the fed funds market.

On a phased basis, this Act opens the door for interstate banking and branching. The most significant aspect of the Act are that it permits, subject to certain limitations, bank holding companies to acquire out-of-state banks, interstate mergers between insured banks and interstate branching through de novo branches.

Interstate banking paved the way for banks to become much larger in size. Nationwide banking has its benefits, though not everyone agrees that the creation of mega-banks.

With interstate banking, the need to have multiple lockboxes in multiple banks will be eliminated. There will be capture points and deposit points around the country that collect funds going into a common demand deposit account system.

With the banks offering a more robust set of services, the cost to corporations will be reduced. Interstate branching means that a single bank may operate branches in more than one state without requiring separate capital and corporate structures for each state.

The state of New York approved the first interstate branching statute in June, This law set several requirements and conditions on New York branches of out-of-state banks. On Septemthe Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of was signed into law by President Clinton.

On a phased basis, this Act opens the door for interstate banking and branching. The most significant aspect of the Act are that it permits, subject to certain limitations, bank holding companies to acquire out. This term is largely used in the US context.

The banking expansion in mid ’s led to the expansion of banking across states in the United States. Legislations that were passed, allowed the banks to acquire banks out of their states on a reciprocal-basis with other states and their corresponding banks. This interstate banking has then led to the rise of regional and national banking chains.

ISBN: OCLC Number: Description: xiv, pages ; 25 cm: Contents: Preface The Scope and Thrust of American Interstate Banking Causes of the Interstate Banking Movement The History of Full-Service Interstate Banking in the United States Research Evidence on the Benefits and Costs of Interstate Banking Public Policy Issues Raised by the Expansion of Banking.

THE EFFECTS OF INTERSTATE BANKING ON COMMERCIAL BANKS' RISK AND PROFITABILITY Beng Soon Chong* Abstract-Historically, the effect of interstate banking on the risk and profitability of commercial banks has been a contro-versial issue.

Using capital market data and an event study methodology, we test the effects of interstate banking. The. One of the results of the Reigel-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of was: A reversal of the branching restrictions of the McFadden Act The sharp reduction in the number of banks that has occurred since the mid s has been due primarily to.The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of first allowed interstate de novo bank branching.

Previously, commercial banks were only permitted to establish branches in states in which they were headquartered. With the enactment of Riegle-Neal, the National Bank Act and Federal Deposit Insurance Act were.The McFadden Act specifically prohibited interstate branching by allowing national banks to branch only within the state in which it is situated.

Although the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act repealed this provision of the McFadden Act, it specified that state law continues to control intrastate branching, or.